The Complaint alleged that Reliance made the final decision to deny Lash’s claim. The claimant failed to state a claim against Matrix is granted.
Lash v. Reliance Standard – Court Dismisses Case For Failure To State Claim Against MatrixRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
The Complaint alleged that Reliance made the final decision to deny Lash’s claim. The claimant failed to state a claim against Matrix is granted.
Lash v. Reliance Standard – Court Dismisses Case For Failure To State Claim Against MatrixRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
The present case involves an ERISA claim for short-term disability and long-term disability insurance benefits where the claimant argues that the administrator improperly denied his claims for benefits. Marc Kouzmanoff (“Kouzmanoff”) was a sales representative for Thompson Reuters Holdings, Inc. (“Thompson Reuters”). In 2001, he developed diabetes; later, in 2016, he applied for disability benefits arguing that his job duties included a …
Kouzmanoff v. Unum – Court Upholds Unum’s Decision To Deny Diabetes ClaimRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
In this case, the court found that United of Omaha Life Insurance Company failed to evaluate the medical evidence presented adequately. The insurer ignored favorable evidence submitted by her treating physician(s), selectively reviewed the evidence it did consider from the treating physicians, failed to conduct its own physical examination, and heavily relied on non-treating nurses and other non-physicians.
Koning v. United Of Omaha – Insurer Failed To Adequately Evaluate Medical EvidenceRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
The Court held, “The level of activity or the lack thereof that Mr. Khalil reported to Liberty in support of his claim of continued disability was undermined by the video evidence that Liberty collected during the three years of review.” The claimant’s claim was further undermined by the fact that his own treating physicians ultimately opined that he was not disabled. The Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and granted Liberty’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
Khalil v. Liberty Life – Surveillance Supports Denial of Long-Term Disability ClaimRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
On May 8, 2015, United informed Kerridge’s counsel by letter that it had denied Kerridge’s appeal. United indicated that its decision was based on the records from Dr. Wilson and the Cleveland Clinic, the other records in Kerridge’s file, and Dr. Zafar’s report from the IME. Kerridge filed a civil action in Federal Court seeking review of United’s decision.
Kerridge v. United Of Omaha – Medical Evidence Does Not Support DisabilityRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
In this case, Kenneth Baker (“Baker”) was an employee who worked for Dunkin Donuts. Through his employment there, he held a policy for long-term disability benefits. Unfortunately, Baker lost all of his administrative appeals with the insurance company. He also lost at the lower Federal Court. The opinion below relates to Baker’s appeal of the …
Baker v. Sun Life – Court Rules In Favor Of Sun LifeRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
Here, Kelly Ann Tyler (“Tyler”) filed a claim for a breach of disability insurance contract against United States Life Insurance Company and American General Life Insurance Company (together, “American General”). Further, she filed claims for a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by American General, seeking punitive damages. Previously, Tyler obtained …
Tyler v. American General – Psychiatrist Files Action For Bad Faith And Punitive DamagesRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
Katherine Kochanek (“Kochanek”) worked as an employee of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”). Through her employment, she was covered by the Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan which included short-term disability benefits. Aetna Life Insurance Co. (“Aetna”) served as the administrator of the Plan. Under the Plan, a “disability” is considered to be any pregnancy-related …
// by Nick Ortiz
The fact that Dee was eventually diagnosed with cancer and that her shoulder pain “in retrospect” was caused by her cancer is not material to a determination of whether her medical care providers at the time of the medical treatment suspected cancer.
Kaiser v. Mutual of Omaha – Pre-Existing Condition Exclusion Does Not ApplyRead More
// by Nick Ortiz
Lisa Jones submitted a claim for long-term disability benefits under an LTD Plan provided to her by Boeing. Aetna was the plan administrator; Aetna denied the LTD claim. Ms. Jones sued under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for denial of benefits and breach of fiduciary duty. The district court (lower court) dismissed the …
Jones v. Aetna – Court Finds Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Is Not DuplicativeRead More
Ortiz Law Firm is a national disability law firm specializing in long-term disability appeals, disability insurance lawsuits, and Social Security Disability claims. Contact us for a free case review.
(888) 321-8131
316 S Baylen St., Ste 590,
Pensacola, FL 32502